On the day fixed in the summons for the defendant to appear and answer, the parties shall be in attendance at the Court-house in person or by their respective pleaders, and the suit shall then be heard unless the hearing is adjourned to a future day fixed by the Court.
Where on the day so fixed it is found that the summons has not been served upon the defendant in consequence of the failure of the plaintiff to pay the court-fee or postal charges (if any) chargeable for such service, the Court may make an order that the suit be dismissed:
Provided that no such order shall be made although the summons has not been served upon the defendant, if on the day fixed for him to appear and answer he attends in person or by agent when he is allowed to appear by agent.
Where neither party appears when the suit is called on for hearing, the Court may make an order that the suit be dismissed.
Where a suit is dismissed under rule 2 or rule 3, the plaintiff may (subject to the law of limitation) bring a fresh suit; or he may apply for an order to set the dismissal aside, and if he satisfies the Court that there was sufficient cause for his not paying the court-fee and postal charges (if any) required within the time fixed before the issue of the summons, or for his non-appearance, as the case may be, the Court shall make an order setting aside the dismissal and shall appoint a day for proceeding with the suit.
(1) Where, after a summons has been issued to the defendant, or to one of several defendants, and returned unserved, the plaintiff fails, for a period of 2[one month] from the date of return made to the Court by the officer ordinarily certifying to the Court returns made by the serving officers, to apply for the issue of a fresh summons the Court shall make an order that the suit be dismissed as against such defendant, unless the plaintiff has within the said period satisfied the Court that-
(a) he has failed after using his best endeavours to discover the residence of the defendant who has not been served, or
(b) such defendant is avoiding service of process, or
(c) there is any other sufficient cause for extending the time, in which case the Court may extend the time for making such application for such period as it thinks fit.
(2) In such case the plaintiff may (subject to the law of limitation) bring a fresh suit.
(1) Where the plaintiff appears and the defendant does not appear when the suit is called on for hearing, then-
(a) if it is proved that the summons was duly served, the Court may proceed ex parte;
When summons duly served
(b) if it is not proved that the summons was duly served, the Court shall direct a second summons to be issued and served on the defendant;
When summons not duly served
(c) if it is proved that the summons was served on the defendant, but not in sufficient time to enable him to appear and answer on the day fixed in the summons, the Court shall postpone the hearing of the suit to a future day to be fixed by the Court, and shall direct notice of such day to be given to the defendant.
(2) Where it is owing to the plaintiff's default that the summons was not duly served or was not served in sufficient time, the Court shall order the plaintiff to pay the costs occasioned by the postponement.
Where the Court has adjourned the hearing of the suit ex parte, and the defendant, at or before such hearing, appears and assigns good cause for his previous non-appearance, he may, upon such terms as the Court directs as to costs or otherwise, be heard in answer to the suit as if he had appeared on the day fixed for his appearance.
Where the defendant appears and the plaintiff does not appear when the suit is called on for hearing, the Court shall make an order that the suit be dismissed, unless the defendant admits the claim, or part thereof, in which case the Court shall pass a decree against the defendant upon such admission, and, where part only of the claim has been admitted, shall dismiss the suit so far as it relates to the remainder.
(1) Where a suit is wholly or partly dismissed under rule 8, the plaintiff shall be precluded from bringing a fresh suit in respect of the same cause of action. But he may apply for an order to set the dismissal aside, and if he satisfies the Court that there was sufficient cause for his non-appearance when the suit was called on for hearing, the Court shall make an order setting aside the dismissal upon such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit, and shall appoint a day for proceeding with the suit.
(2) No order shall be made under this rule unless notice of the application has been served on the opposite party.
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 9 or any other law, the Court may, in order to avoid delay and expedite disposal, directly set aside the dismissal without requiring the plaintiff to adduce evidence to satisfy it aboutsufficient causes as required under rule 9, but requiring him to pay such cost not exceeding one thousand taka as it may deem appropriate and determine:
Provided that the dismissal under rule 8 shall not be set aside under this rule, unless an application, supported by affidavit, praying for setting aside the order of dismissal is made to the Court within thirty days of the date on which the order of dismissal is made:
Provided further that no dismissal shall be set aside more than once under this rule.
(2) As soon as an order under sub-rule (1) is made setting aside ex parte dismissal, the Court shall cause notice thereof to be served at the cost of the plaintiff upon the defendant who appeared in the suit.]
Where there are more plaintiffs than one, and one or more of them appear, and the others do not appear, the Court may, at the instance of the plaintiff or plaintiffs appearing, permit the suit to proceed in the same way as if all the plaintiffs had appeared, or make such order as it thinks fit.
Where there are more defendants than one, and one or more of them appear, and the others do not appear, the suit shall proceed, and the Court shall, at the time of pronouncing judgment, make such order as it thinks fit with respect to the defendants who do not appear.
Where a plaintiff or defendant, who has been ordered to appear in person, does not appear in person, or show sufficient cause to the satisfaction of the Court for failing so to appear, he shall be subject to all the provisions of the foregoing rules applicable to plaintiffs and defendants, respectively, who do not appear.
13.(1) In any case in which a decree is passed ex parte against a defendant, he may apply to the Court by which the decree was passed for an order to set it aside; and if he satisfies the Court that the summons was not duly served, or that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from appearing when the suit was called on for hearing, the Court shall make an order setting aside the decree as against him upon such terms as to costs,
payment into Court or otherwise as it thinks fit, and shall appoint a day for proceeding with the suit:
Provided that where the decree is of such a nature that it cannot be set aside as against such defendant only it may be set aside as against all or any of the other defendants also1[:
Provided further that no decree shall be set aside more than once under this rule at the instance of the same defendant.]
(2) Provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908 shall apply to the applications under rule 13 (1) of this order.
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 13 or any other law, the Court may, in order to avoid delay and expedite disposal, directly set aside the decree without requiring the defendant to adduce evidence to satisfy it about sufficient causes as required under rule 13, but requiring him to pay such cost not exceeding three thousand taka as it may deem appropriate and determine:
Provided that the decree under this rule shall not be set aside unless an application, supported by affidavit, praying for setting aside the decree is made to the Court within thirty days of the date on which the decree is passed by the defendant who appeared and filed written statement:
Provided further that no decree shall be set aside more than once under this rule at the instance of the same defendant.
(2) As soon as an order under sub-rule (1) is made setting aside an ex parte decree, the Court shall cause notice thereof to be served at the cost of the defendant upon the plaintiff.]
No decree shall be set aside on any such application as aforesaid unless notice thereof has been served on the opposite party
Where the dismissal of a suit is set aside under rule 4 or rule 9 or a decree is set aside under rule 13, the suit shall on restoration, proceed from the stage where it was immediately before the making of the order of dismissal or passing of the decree.]
Where the dismissal of a suit is set aside under rule 4 or rule 9 or a decree is set aside under rule 13, the suit shall on restoration, proceed from the stage where it was immediately before the making of the order of dismissal or passing of the decree.]